Two pictures of me!

I have always wanted to show a picture of myself! Here they are:




Now you know what I look like.

THE END

A theorical system of government: Stevecracy

This is an essay and I will email it to my teacher.

Stevecracy is a system which advocates that should be 2 pairs of groups which support each other. Both groups in both of the pairs, not the pairs just the groups, are organized.

Before I can talk more you need to know the pairs and the groups inside of the pairs. Here I go:
PAIR ONE:

• The government
• The people

PAIR TWO:

• The wealthy
• The working class

The reason why they are organized is to stop a leak of power. For example, if the government persecutes the people it will the right and duty of the people to stop. Since they have equal power they could do that.

I do not promote the idea that a government should use Stevecracy without some form of testing to see if it not only good in theory. Of course, like the lottocrats, the stevecrats have the problem "How do we test it?".

It would be honest to say I don't support or oppose this idea and that it will have flaws, like all systems. Of course, the issue in stevecratic debates will be "Does it have a lot more benefits than bad side defects and do the benefits have more value in a stevecratic system?".

I came up with the idea when I was thinking about the current systems of government and thinking "Could there one better than the best one?" and I came up with this. In theory, extreme balance of powers(which is the main ideology of Stevecracy) is a very good thing but what about in practice?

I think that democratic Stevecracy, where the organized groups are democratic, is the best type of Stevecracy. I want people to make up there own mind about Stevecracy.

Here some theoretical benefits and side defects that a Stevecracy would bring:

• In a Stevecracy, a group that is persecuted could stop the persecution with there power.
• If both groups in one pairs supports a bad issue that pair regards they could use there equal powers to enact it.

I am sorry but that is all I can think of. So, I want to know what you think.

THE END

My thoughts on the 2011 Libyan Civil War

I have been editing Wikipedia over the 2011 Libyan Civil War(or uprising as they call it) but I have barely, if ever, talked about why Gaddafi is a tyrant and crazy. I want Gaddafi arrested for LIFE!

Most of us are Anti-Gaddafi because is very crazy, he must being taking Charlie Sheen. I hope that this war will be remembered for all of history and people will see him as the next Adolf Hitler expect his people doesn't love him unlike Hitler's people.

Yet he thinks his people love him, and he defend this by saying the anti-Gaddafi people aren't his people(No True Scotsman much Gaddafi?). Muammar al-Gaddafi here is saying that his people love him and that people who love him are his people which is self-set standard made to prove an idiotic point.

You might have seen that my language is very negative, well good he deserves it. Thank you France, Canada, United States, Qatar, Italy, Revolutionary Egypt, Revolutionary Tunisia, Norway, Saudi Arabia etc. for fighting Gaddafi. If you are one of the few countries that sends help the evil Libya I wish you would stop.

THE END

Faux(not the news station) history

In 1942, Kris McDonald discovered the Americas and than claimed it has his own. However, the British claimed they claimed the Americas in 1812, so the new nation — called the United Continents of the Americas — fought its first war called the War Over 1812.

---
The result was that the new government was seen as the rightful owner of the Americas. However, in Britain — where the war started — it was unpopular and people called it the "Next World War II".
---
In 2004, Barack Obama was elected the first African-American president so people could make the Birther movement — and the Tea Party movement as a whole — more popular.

THE END

Is the Objectivist Party truely Objectivist?

As a critic of Objectivism, I was kinda angry to find out that my imagination was right — there is an Objectivist Party there is an Objectivist Party. However, after looking at the website I had to ask the question, "Is it truely Objectivist?". I think not, however, it is a capitalist party.

The principals of the Objectivist Party are:

• I. INDIVIDUALS HAVE A RIGHT TO LIFE
• II. INDIVIDUALS HAVE A RIGHT TO THEIR OWN THOUGHTS
• III. INDIVIDUALS HAVE A RIGHT TO THEIR OWN PROPERTY
• IV. INDIVIDUALS HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTECT THEMSELVES
  

--- Objectivist Party

Okay, it is capitalist — even free-market capitalism. However, in the principals never mention a policy that would shout "THIS IS OBJECTIVIST!". Sure, reading some of the STATE policies their is hints of Objectivism, but that is national.

I want to know what you think, are you going to defend the party by proving it is Objectivist?

THE END

I think Allah is planning to send a new book to the Japanese. Allah let me had a peak at the book, one of its verse.

For Allah sent the tsunami at Japan to the unbelievers in Japan. For those that have died are burning in the fire

--- Neo-Qur'an 27:1 Surah "The Tsunami"

Now, some Muslims are going to say "Allah would never say something like that". Lets see what we know about Islam and what we know about Japan and lets judge.

• Allah doesn't like unbelievers(Qur'an 30:45)
• They burn in the fire(pretty much every page of the Qur'an)
• Most Japanese people are unbelievers(ever heard a lot of Muslims in Japan?)
• Allah has UNLIMITED power.
• Thus, he has the motivate and ability to do it

This is like a cop investigation. Most likely, Allah did it.

Muslims, I look forward to your responses.

THE END

A 1-Party Monopoly in the U.S.?

The GOP is losing favour lately in United States, the Democratic Party is getting more support. There powerful now, but I predict that the GOP will lose favour, and when it does the American people will probably turn to the Democratic Party.

However, there is a lot of other Political Parties. I am sure that Democrats and Republicans reading this will secretly say to themselves, "I agree more with the (insert party here) Party more than mine".

So here is a list:

• Libertarian Party: Are you a free-market capitalist, libertarian and non-interventionist? Then this is party for you!
• Green Party: Are you a populist, social democrat, politically green, grassroots democratic and a progressive. Then this is the party for you!
• Jefferson Republican Party: Do you like Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party? Are you pro-states' rights, against illegal immigration, and LARGELY Anti-War, however, want to celebrate American soldiers from the American Independence War. Then this is the party for you!
• Tanner Party: Are you for the freedom of religion and think defence is the ONLY justification for fighting a war? Do you support a lot of secession movements and want the Union not to exist at all? Then this is the party for you!
• Communist Party USA: Are you a Marxist-Leninist, but think that one should have the freedom of religion? Then this is the party for you!
• Socialist Party USA: Are you a democratic socialist and pacifist? Then this is the party for you!

Those are the political parties I know of, there is a lot more.

THE END