Aliveiness

I AM ALIVE!

However, summer is fun.

Meh

Geert Wilders is acquited, I have no opinion. Stevecracy hasn't been introduced as a form of government or communism really so I am going back to blog-off mode.

Update

I haven't forgotten this blog.

Blocked in China

Okay, it's official, I am blocked in Capitalist™ China®, not because Hu Jintao and his team have ever read my blog(in a translation or in it's original English). It is because blogspot.com is blocked for free expression, speech and press.

Communism is a system of government in which a democratically-controlled government has economic control and they provide for EVERYONE. So, we prove that China is not communist, now lets talk about how the Chinese can escape the Great Firewall.

Here is a list of ideas you can try, I AM responsible if you try it. Of course, I am not a Chinese person. This is from Wikipedia which has CC-BY-SA licence:

• Using a proxy server outside China
• Companies can establish regional Web sites within China. This prevents their content from going through the Great Firewall of China; however, it requires companies to apply for local ICP licenses.
• Onion routing, such as I2P or Tor, can be used.
• Professional advice from any one of the many companies offering bypass services from outside of China.
• IJOVPN, PaperBus, Freegate and Ultrasurf are free programs that circumvent the China firewall using multiple open proxies, but still behave as though the user is in China. Ultrasurf also scans for various government and commercial websites from the user's computer, and may be used to monitor dissidents.^[21]
• Open application programming interface (API) used by Twitter which enables to post and retrieve tweets on sites other than Twitter. "The idea is that coders elsewhere get to Twitter, and offer up feeds at their own URLs—which the government has to chase down one by one." says Jonathan Zittrain, co-director of Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet and Society.
• Reconfiguration at the end points of communication, encryption,discarding reset packets according to the TTL value (time to live) by distinguishing those resets generated by the Firewall and those made by end user, not routing any further packets to sites that have triggered blocking behavior ^[22]

That is from the article "Great Firewall of China®"(® symbol not in the article name).

Theocracy: A Criticism

I am a fan of politics and religion so I will intermix them. It is bad enough that we live in a capitalistic society, now some Oligarchs want to the United Empire of Terra, or the United States, in to the Theocratic Empire of Terra. Here is why theocracy sucks.

Theocracy is basically a form of government were a religion or sect is its laws and the constitution is the holy book of the religion. In a theocracy, god or a god is the dictator of the country.

As most people of faith will say, their belief is based on faith. I won't criticize that but if you can't prove the existence of a being than why should it be the leader of a nation? If you want to believe based on faith, go ahead but don't tell me that your god or your favorite god should be a nation.

In conclusion, you can have faith but it is bad to force on every once else. Excluding Vatican City since nobody who isn't part of the Catholic Church is related to it can became a citizen(for good reasons).

THE END

Two pictures of me!

I have always wanted to show a picture of myself! Here they are:




Now you know what I look like.

THE END

A theorical system of government: Stevecracy

This is an essay and I will email it to my teacher.

Stevecracy is a system which advocates that should be 2 pairs of groups which support each other. Both groups in both of the pairs, not the pairs just the groups, are organized.

Before I can talk more you need to know the pairs and the groups inside of the pairs. Here I go:
PAIR ONE:

• The government
• The people

PAIR TWO:

• The wealthy
• The working class

The reason why they are organized is to stop a leak of power. For example, if the government persecutes the people it will the right and duty of the people to stop. Since they have equal power they could do that.

I do not promote the idea that a government should use Stevecracy without some form of testing to see if it not only good in theory. Of course, like the lottocrats, the stevecrats have the problem "How do we test it?".

It would be honest to say I don't support or oppose this idea and that it will have flaws, like all systems. Of course, the issue in stevecratic debates will be "Does it have a lot more benefits than bad side defects and do the benefits have more value in a stevecratic system?".

I came up with the idea when I was thinking about the current systems of government and thinking "Could there one better than the best one?" and I came up with this. In theory, extreme balance of powers(which is the main ideology of Stevecracy) is a very good thing but what about in practice?

I think that democratic Stevecracy, where the organized groups are democratic, is the best type of Stevecracy. I want people to make up there own mind about Stevecracy.

Here some theoretical benefits and side defects that a Stevecracy would bring:

• In a Stevecracy, a group that is persecuted could stop the persecution with there power.
• If both groups in one pairs supports a bad issue that pair regards they could use there equal powers to enact it.

I am sorry but that is all I can think of. So, I want to know what you think.

THE END